<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Generation of Ford Engines: The Coyote Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newcarpark.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newcarpark.com/blog/?p=283</link>
	<description>New car news updates and new car articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:17:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.newcarpark.com/blog/?p=283&#038;cpage=1#comment-383049</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcarpark.com/blog/?p=283#comment-383049</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  I assume they meant 0 to 60.  And those fuel economy figures sound a bit like wishful thinking. Still though, it should be one hell of an engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  I assume they meant 0 to 60.  And those fuel economy figures sound a bit like wishful thinking. Still though, it should be one hell of an engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Feist</title>
		<link>http://www.newcarpark.com/blog/?p=283&#038;cpage=1#comment-370435</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Feist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcarpark.com/blog/?p=283#comment-370435</guid>
		<description>Hello, 0 to 100 miles per hour in less than 5 seconds not likely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, 0 to 100 miles per hour in less than 5 seconds not likely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
